On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 11:49 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:56:12AM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
> > Intel enabled open-fcoe support in the kernel back in 2007, since
> > then
> > it has maintained that code as an open source project hosted at
> > open-
> > fcoe.org and at the OSU Open Source Lab. Today, the software
> > enabling
> > FCoE is very mature and self-sufficient. Due to the maturity of the
> > project, a less active "hands on" approach is needed by Intel in
> > its
> > maintenance. As a result, Intel is moving away from actively
> > maintaining the project including the mailing list, git
> > repositories,
> > and project maintainership.
> > 
> > If someone from the open-fcoe community with a confirmed
> > contribution
> > history comes forward with a desire to pick up the mantle of
> > maintainership, then please reply to this message and I can pass on
> > maintainership to them. Otherwise open-fcoe will lack a current
> > maintainer when I remove my name from the MAINTAINERS file, and it
> > will
> > become an orphaned project.
> 
> A fair coin toss between Hannes and me decided I'll volunteer to take
> over the
> maintainership of open-fcoe.
> 
> If noone disagrees with that, of cause.
> 
Good and works for me, I'll send offlist open-fcoe.org access info.
Go ahead and update maintainer file with your contact replacing my
name.

//Vasudev


_______________________________________________
fcoe-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/fcoe-devel

Reply via email to