Behavioral Biometrics sounds like a bit of a shaky affair to me. Not only would authentication take quite a while...[after all how much behavioral safety can there be in 30seconds of typing?] but what happens if you have bad flu, or loose a finger and your behaviors are all put out.
---- Original Message ---- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [FDE] Going Beyond Biometrics - Behavioral Metrics Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:39:44 -0800 (PST) >With the increase concern on data access and data protection, >highlighted >by identity thefts and data break-ins or corporation and personal >computer, there is a renaissance in the research of identification >systems >that are reliable and tamper-proof. The good old username and >password has >been the granddaddy of identification in the computer age. Recently >the >focus has been shifted to biometrics. However, the biometric >identification that most people are familiar with revolves around >fingerprint, retinal/iris, or voice recognition. Well, biometrics is >deeper than that. It deals with such basic aspects of human >behavioral >distinctions such as your keyboard clicking rhythm, your writing >style, >and your hand script patterns. So, even if you have multiple alias >and/or >anonymous accounts on the Internet, the way you do things on-line may > >still reveal your true identity. Read full article on this research >here >(http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070113/bob9.asp). >_______________________________________________ >FDE mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde _______________________________________________ FDE mailing list [email protected] http://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde
