Curt Wilson wrote: [snip]
> From what I can see, FDE does not meet this particular need. [snip] > If the user can see the data, so can the malware, to the best of my knowledge. My guess is you are correct; however, we are not, general, trying to provide an infinitely high barrier to prevent any possible compromise of data, only one that is higher than the current and near term high jumpers can get over. FDE will not protect against all vectors, which is why we need to broaden the scope of our thinking (not necessarily this list) to additional tools or practices. To go back to the high jumper analogy for an example, a high jumper has to have the room to accelerate before using their pole to get over the bar. As they go over the bar, they leave behind their pole, so a secondary barrier set a few feet beyond where they will likely land does not need to be as high because the height the gained with the advantage of the pole is no longer available to them. This is defense in depth, and is, AFAIK, the only real defense; therefore, the proper strategy that must be applied. Silver bullets died out with vampires and the Lone Ranger. Best, Allen _______________________________________________ FDE mailing list [email protected] http://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde
