With respect, that's not what was said in class at all. Brain specifically said that chapter 17 and onwards would have meant that you were able, so long as you new it perfectly, to do a MINIMUM of 5 questions per year. i think he was saying that if you were stuck for time, you would have been able to do all the past exams with just ch. 17 onwards. main focus was not the emphasis there at all.
he's been pretty insistent that you can't leave anything out. I'm not relying on being able to do only 5 questions perfectly. I suppose if you are confident that you can do anything perfectly, you only need to know the rights and have luck, but thats not what was said at all. On Sep 6, 2:25 pm, Elaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Griffith, chapters 17 onwards - the rights - should be > our main focus. According to the lecturer, O'Carolan himself said that > we should be alright if we know these! Obviously, dont go leaving out > everything else, but it's a good place to start off... > And the Nutshells book is excellent, it gives you a much clearer > overview of the course. > Hope this helps! > > On 5 Sep, 11:13, Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What should I be prioritising in Constitutional? I find the course to > > be huge so obviously some of the chapters from the Griffith manual > > should be further down the list of importance. > > I know separation of powers is probably the most important, but what > > comes after that? > > Thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
