I've passed FE1s, Contract in particular, by just saying 'English case, name of which i cannot recall, where x and y happened...' for almost every case bar maybe the famous ones.... In other words, don't get too hung up on case names etc... just show the examiner that you know what the question is about, even if you don't know the actual case name. Just putting down a simple fact from the particular case is as good as knowing the case name. Worked for me anyay...
On Sep 7, 3:00 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great, thanks for that. It's a big relief seeing how little time there > is per question. > > On Sep 7, 3:14 pm, the gaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > No.Once you show you know what ure on about,you're fine. ECJ/AG/SC/HC/ > > DPP etc is grand.If it's a land mark case eg 'Haughey' in const or > > 'Fibrosa' in contract and so on, that's ok too. > > > On Sep 7, 1:36 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > Do you think abbreviations are acceptable for case names in the exams- > > > e.g. A.G for attorney general etc. Also, do you lose marks for only > > > putting down one party's name if you can't remember the other? > > > > Also in terms of accuracy of spelling etc, can you lose marks if it's > > > way off?!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
