Doesn't give a definitive answer.Just goes on about inviobility of dwellings,property rights on her part and Heaney v Irl on Ubi's part (ie it's a catch all case that you quote when you're saying rights must be balanced with other's rights bla bla)
The radio case is about self incrimination/right to silence. To be honest looking at that paper I'd have struggled with it.! On Sep 20, 4:28 pm, stripey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know what the examiner's report said in relation to > questions 3 (on whether Mrs Jones can discriminate against Ubi in her > private dwelling?) & question 6 (admissibility of the Radio Stations > records, in October 2005 paper? > > Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
