i think, its in relation to modified fee simples and the invalidity of condition subsequent
On Oct 14, 3:38 pm, billybob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody any ides where this case fits in? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
