yeah you neednt worry about the 30yrs thing. Most of the question was
about all the other aspects of adverse possession. Sure if you were to
start out by saying that the limitation period was 30years you would
have had nothing to write. Just wondering if any one did the bit part
in q3 about the rights and duties of cohabitants. It was my last
question and had very little time to thik about it. I interpreted it
as being about trusts of the family home which applies to both married
couples and cohabitees ergo the reference to cohabitants. Dont know if
I was correct. My 4th question was on s117 and had a blank on some of
the more recent cases but could remember the facts and and waffled on
a bit about likelihood of Marie succeding in her application.
Hopefully did enough to pass. On Oct 15, 9:11 pm, ShellBelle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Don't worry you won't get 0, the
limitation periods are only one> aspect of the problem. You'll get
marks for the other issues you> discussed - animus possidendi, future
intended use, etc....> > On Oct 15, 6:12 pm, the gaffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > > OH FU*K! That hardly means I get
0 for the AP question ?> > > On Oct 15, 5:39 pm, ShellBelle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > Yeah it was 30 years because
its owned by a state authority. I did Q8> > > on s117 and tiny bit on
the validity of the condition attached to the> > > gift to Marie as it
was a restriction on alienation.> > > > On Oct 15, 5:25 pm,
aviationhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > > I thought the
succession questions were ok, though I hope by answering> > > > the
majority of Q8 re S117 I was correct!!> > > > > The AP question was
also ok I think. I presume that by transfering to> > > > his son the
time can continue as though there was no change in> > > > squatter.
Also am I correct in thinking that as it was a 'statutory> > > > body'
that purchased the land, the time period for AP will be 30> > > >
years? And therefore there could be no AP?> > > > > On Oct 15,
5:12 pm, ShellBelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > > > Hey> >
> > > > Ditto what you said about all the help that was given in this
forum,> > > > > has been great!> > > > > > I thought land was ok apart
from the length of the 2 succession> > > > > questions, ran out of
time on the last one they took much longer than> > > > > my other 3
questions I did.> > > > > > Was a bit confused in the AP question
about of the effect of the fact> > > > > that the adverse possessor
gave the field to his son. Other than that> > > > > no major problems
apart from the fact that I couldn't cite the numbers> > > > > of the
sections in the SLA but I knew the content of the sections so> > > > >
will hopefully be ok!!> > > > > > On Oct 15, 5:04 pm, aviationhead
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > > > > Hi Guys!> > > > > > Might I
just begin by thanking you all for your invaluable help over> > > > >
> the past couple of months. It is much appreciated.> > > > > > > So
How did you all find land today?> > > > > > > I thought it was a
challanging enough paper. But perhaps that was down> > > > > > to the
fact that it was the last exam and burnout wasnt too far away!!- Hide
quoted text -> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -> > >
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -> > > > - Show quoted text
-- Hide quoted text -> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -> >
- Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1
Study Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
