Hello, Ok so we all know the Const reports are shite. I really thought I handed up gold in Oct, but it was the only one I failed.Can't understand it.It's the only one I have left now for this sitting. In Q1,it was about equality with one point about right to earn a livig,yes?I also wrote about Art 37/McDonald v Bord na gCon...I get confused over McDonald/Re Solicitors Act (which I Know only applies to criminal matters) and Natural Justice/Fair Procedure.Does fair procedure only have to be followed by a decision making body granted judicial functions under statute as per Art 37? ie would,say, a GAA disciplinary panel need to observe fair procedure if it could be argued its decisions could affect the addresse's rights? eg their good name? Also...natural law v natural justice...what's the story there?Is natural law natural rights inherent to people in their capacity as human beings (Aristotle etc)? Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
