the capacity stuff isn't about the entitlement to buy, its the entitlement to repudiate contracts that you enter into. its capacity "lite" rather than real limits on capacity.
On Mar 8, 7:32 pm, tiger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > Just wondering if anyone can explain how minors can buy things in > shops eg toys, which cannot constitute necessaries. Pursuant to the > Infant Relief Act 1874 and the subsequent case law - Skrine v Gordon, > Ryder v Wombwell and Nash v Inman, the subject of the contract should > be necessary. (hunting horse, cufflinks decorated with jewels, and > extra waistcoats were not necessary in these cases). > > Has the act been repealed/amended, or do people just conveniently > ignore it? > > Probably missing something really obvious but notes unclear. > > Thanks a mill. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
