That's a great help thanks!

On Aug 24, 3:25 pm, b05bf1e4 <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wouldn't mind having a look at it myself...
>
> Here's what Brian Foley posted on another thread:
>
> "Re the last paper, the below is my quick view of what I thought the
> questions were about.  Re the nutshells...just watch out for them out
> of date, but I think Fergus has a new one out.  A lot of the time,
> Eoin Carolan sets questions based on facts of very recent cases (i.e.
> the question about Cogley etc).
>
> Question 1 - the family (notion of balance viz parents / children)
>
> Question 2: Privacy
>
> Question 3: question about judicial power / separation of powers
> using
> unenumerated rights (i.e. should judges make up rights etc) as a
> spring board.
>
> Question 4: Cabinet disclosure etc (in separation of powers rubric)
>
> Question 5: Free Expression / Political Expression / Electoral
> Regulation (I'm told by the examiner that very, very students didn't
> touch freedom of expression for this question)
>
> Question 6: Property rights mixed with question requiring general
> insight into judicial power / naked judicial power etc.
>
> Question 7:  Delay! (article 38.1)
>
> Question 8: non-delegation doctrine / secondary legislation."
>
> On Aug 23, 9:25 am, Grey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi there, just wondering if anyone has the paper from the April 09
> > sitting on constitutional and if they would mind uploading it?
>
> > If not, I'd settle for finding out what area of separation of powers
> > the examiner questioned.
>
> > Cheers,
> > M- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to