It is not true that the ag was expected to come up. There is no basis for anyone saying that any more than anything else was 'expected'. don't let that eat at you. for every question that was asked which was 'tipped' six were tipped that were not.
Brian Sent using Vodafone Business Email -----Original Message----- From: "b05bf1e4" <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:53:36 -0700 (PDT) To: "FE-1 Study Group" <[email protected]> Received: 02-Oct-2009 19:53:39 +0000 Subject: Re: Constitutional I thought the paper was ok, no real problems to complain about...can't say much else about it! I did find the essay re good name a bit vague though and i suspect that he was inviting you to challenge the question... One matter did concern me which i found out afterwards...apparently, the attorney general was a "hot tip" and expected to come up...I didn't even know it was examinable! Very strange and i fail to believe that this just came to someone in a vision! On Oct 2, 7:27 pm, Bee <[email protected]> wrote: > God ya that was a god send! The last q was one that was taken right > out of a previous paper on equality which is surprising enough. What > was the second last q on? > > On Oct 2, 7:22 pm, Wendy Lyon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I don't have the paper to hand but was that the one about the civil > > servant? All I could get out of it was that the statute was vague, it > > was a serious offence (penalty-wise) but triable summarily and there > > also seemed to be a mens rea issue there but I'm not sure if that's > > what a Constitutional examiner would be looking for ... so I decided > > to skip it :) > > > Thought the paper was mostly ok apart from that, I was praying for > > that Article 26 question!!! > > > On 02/10/2009, Bee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > So what did everyone think of Constitutional? Pretty rough paper I > > > thought. Can anyone tell me what was question 3 about???!!! I did it > > > as my last question and put in any old rubbish I could think of that > > > was relevant. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
