yep...no joy...it'll come to me! On 3/6/10, Aoife McBennett <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Brian! > > Have you tried typing the lyrics of the tune into Google?! > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Brian Foley BL > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Some arising are (1) strict / absolute liability - CC v Ireland and what >> happens next etc...bringing in Re Article 26 and the Employment Equality >> Bill Reference 1997 on the need for strict liability (2) the >> constitutional >> limits on how one can define a crime (3) the constitutional limitation on >> the DC jurisdiction - i.e. minor offences >> >> There may be more, but I'm really trying to remember the name to a >> particular 1990's rock ballad right now and its taking over my brain. >> >> Brian >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of McB >> Sent: 06 March 2010 19:18 >> To: FE-1 Study Group >> Subject: Constitutional Q - October 2009 Q2 >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Does anyone have an idea as to the issues arising in Q2 Oct 09? >> >> Q. The Oireachtas enacts the Protection of Official Records Act 2009. >> S1 of the Act defines an official record as 'any record which it would >> not have intended to release'. >> >> Secion 2 of the Act creates a criminal offence of 'releasing official >> records without authorisation'. The offence is punishable by 5 years >> imprisonment and/or fine of €10k. The offence is tried summarily >> before a District Court judge. >> >> Billy is a civil servant in the Dept of Economic Affairs. His job is >> to release documents to the media that have been authorised for >> release by the relevant officer. >> >> His superior officer gives him a file which is to be sent to a >> journalist with the Irish Herald. Unknown to him, the file contains a >> document, the release of which has not been authorised. He sends the >> full file to the journalist, who publishes the material in a front- >> page story. >> >> Billy charged with offence under s2 of the Act. Advise him, if it is >> possible to prevent prosecution on grounds of Irish constitutional >> law. >> >> * >> * >> * * >> >> I can only identify the issues in paragraph 2 about distinction >> between minor and non-minor offences. I'm at a loss as to identifying >> other issues. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Aoife >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "FE-1 Study Group" group. >> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2726 - Release Date: 03/06/10 >> 07:39:00 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "FE-1 Study Group" group. >> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > >
-- ____________ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
