more info on it here http://www.byrnewallace.com/Media/News/News_List/Paddy_McKillen_successful_in_Supreme_Court_challenge/
On Feb 16, 3:37 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > the mckillen case might be pertinent > > On Feb 10, 10:17 am, 'kathleen doocey' <[email protected]> wrote: > > > property rights, in light of NAMA etc might be one to watch. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From:[email protected] > > To:"FE-1 Study Group" > > > Cc: > > Sent:Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:38:18 -0800 (PST) > > Subject:Re: Constitutional Discussion > > > Anyone any more ideas on this? Its my first time and the course looks > > HUGE! Can I leave anything out? > > > On Dec 13 2010, 9:06Â pm, 8th Timer wrote: > > > Settling down to study Constitutional... any major changes to the > > > syllabus, by way of new cases/developments etc, in the last year? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > To post to this group, send an email to > > [email protected] [1]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] [2]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB[3]. > > > Links: > > ------ > > [1] mailto:[email protected] > > [2] mailto:[email protected] > > [3]http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
