On 03/12/2016 02:13 AM, Nevin ":-)" Liber <Nevin :-) Liber wrote: > On Mar 11, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Jens Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> For >> s.data() >> >> the workaround is something like >> >> &s[0] >> >> (Both const and non-const.) > > It's slightly worse: > > v.empty() ? nullptr : &v.front()
Thanks for the correction. I still think we don't need a macro for a user to enable non-substantial syntactic sugar. Jens _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
