On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Nelson, Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All the variant changes from Oulu should be covered by > > __has_include(<variant>); I don't think we have a need to track them > > separately unless someone chooses to produce a <variant> header that > > doesn't match the contents of any working draft. > > I note that you don't mention the changes to "any" or "optional". Should I > infer that you think those changes deserve a macro, even though the > previous state appeared in only one WD? I'd be happy not adding a macro for those either if no-one has shipped the previous version yet. (And if they already have, I think we'd need to discuss this, but it's still probably also appropriate to not add a macro.)
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
