On 7 September 2017 at 01:23, Nelson, Clark wrote: > So it looks like the only remaining questions in the C++17 table that we > haven't considered yet are what to do about new features in the filesystem > library. > > Unless someone on this list comes up with a suggestion, I'll reach out to > Beman for ideas on that.
I started writing an email about them after the telecon, but didn't finish it. I think in theory it's worth having separate macros for those features , but in practice nobody has shipped a conforming implementation of __cpp_lib_filesystem == 201603 yet, so having extra macros for changes to that spec might not be useful. We could just update __cpp_lib_filesystem to 201703. If we do want macros, I suggest these names: __cpp_lib_filesystem_relative_paths __cpp_lib_filesystem_directory_entry_caching __cpp_lib_filesystem_string_view _______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
