On 14/11/2019 01.49, Richard Smith via Core wrote: > That said... I'm actually more inclined to say we should remove > __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class entirely and just bump > __cpp_nontype_template_args. No-one ever fully implemented > __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class as far as I'm aware, and the feature > we ended up with isn't class-type-specific (what we have now is "anything > fully constant other than non-public subobjects or rvalue references").
Agreed. Jens _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
