On Jun 26, 2013, at 7:24 AM, David Disseldorp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:36:56 -0400 > Chuck Lever <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> The shared libraries don't appear to be needed to satisfy missing symbols >>> for the plug-in library. My preference would be to completely remove the >>> $(LIB*) entries from libnfsjunct_la_LIBADD, rather than keep the >>> incorrect order. >> >> Would it be acceptable to make that change in 0.10-devel, and not in >> 0.9-stable? > > Sure, I'm fine with that. The second patch: > [PATCH 2/2] build: fix gcc linker library argument placement > could be pulled in independent of the plug-in library change, or would > you prefer that I resend? I've merged 2/2 into both 0.9.2 and 0.10-devel. It will appear in 0.9.2 when it is published next week. 0.10-devel, which branched at 0.9.0, is still in my main private repo. I'll push it to my public repo once 0.9.2 is out. Nothing exciting there yet! -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com _______________________________________________ fedfs-utils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/fedfs-utils-devel
