Hi Frns... I have some Close up Obkects.. which I have shot using my Nikon-D50... will you guys accept such content .. If ,so i will upload in the next mail. Thankyou.. Dreko
2008/8/7 Michael Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How about uploading scaled down images to the wiki to show there, and > uploading the full sized images to fedorapeople and providing a direct link > to those on the wiki page with the gallery? May be a bit of extra work, but > it'd save strain on the wiki. > > Martin Sourada wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 13:11 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > > > For images stored in the wiki the thumbnails are created on the server. > > > > Then I think uploading it to wiki directly is better way. > > > > I was thinking about file sizes... the JPEGs straight from my camera are > about 4.5-5MB, resized at 1920x1200, they will get under 1.5MB, but this > is still quite large (and the file size will be a problem for the > package too). > > > > That's a drawback of providing quality images we need to pay if we > decide to provide them. There are already packages in repos that have > size around 200MB and the extras backgrounds would fall into that kind > of packages too. Therefore I was thinking about splitting the package > into sub-packages as per the (sub-)categories listed on the wiki + plus > providing meta-packages to e.g. install all sub-categories of the > specified category, or everything. That would be nicer to our users. > > Maybe even make separate packages for wide-screen wallpapers as people > with 16:10 displays usually do not need 4:3 wallpapers and vice-versa. > > Another itchy thing is update of such packages. In environments with > yum-presto the issue would not be big, but for standard fedora > environment as it is now it means a lot of d/l with every update. That > would mean we'd need to keep the updates low and/or rather than making > sub-packages for categories, make the fully separate packages (but keep > the sub-categories-subpackages). > > Btw. it is good thing to have upstream in more convenient place than > wiki/rpm, therefore making a fedorahosted.org project for that might be > a good idea. What do you think? > > Any ideas/comments on that matter? > > Martin > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-art-list mailing [EMAIL > PROTECTED]://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list > > > > -- > ~Michaelhttp://michaelbox.net > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-art-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list >
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
