On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 11:33 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 09:42 -0500, Clark Williams wrote: > > I've used XML-RPC to implement services a couple of times now. Both > > times it's been python to python, with a python client talking to a > > python server running under mod_python in Apache. I'm not sure how > > you would implement XML-RPC in a push mode, since someone has to > > provide the remote procedure call service and someone has to call it. > > > > I really like XML-RPC as a an RPC mechanism, but I think it's a bit of > > overkill for this. To do it as an RPC, we would have to listen on a > > socket for someone to ask "what's your state?" and reply with the > > current state of the build. I'd say it's much simpler to "publish" the > > state to somewhere that anyone who cares (e.g. plague) can read it. > > I'm still thinking shared memory, but there may be another mechanism > > (a simpler one) that I'm missing. > > > > What about using dbus? Its not "simple" per se, but should scale pretty > well and allow for pretty good interaction.
gonna play hell if our builders are rhel4. -sv -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
