-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 16 August 2006 13:23, Clark Williams wrote: >> So, you'd like it if we added it to the upstream copy? I'm not against >> since there seems to be a use for it. > > Yes please (:
Okey doke, it's in both the mock-0.6 branch (what's being released to the world, atm) and the HEAD branch (currently 0.7). > > Also, you should do a diff against the spec that is in extras CVS. I don't > _think_ I changed much (and I didn't comment in the changelog about any such > changes), but a diff would be good to do anyway. > Gladly, but I have no idea where that repo is :). Should I just pull the SRPM from an extras repo? Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE41rrHyuj/+TTEp0RApUEAKCyYpaOB/bVtxaiGxqiS1dLfwaojACePv2J GlBMF7EiWDD2Pa2PnWJpRv0= =KgBP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
