> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Clark Williams > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:56 AM > To: Discussion of Fedora build system > Subject: Re: mock SELinux policy as RPM package > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the question of a package of the mock SELinux policy from > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks > > > > has come up a few times in the past, and I have made an RPM > package for > > my own use some time ago: > > > > http://n-dimensional.de/software/mock-selinux-policy/ > > > > It doesn't have all the bells and whistles Paul Howarth has > mentioned in > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux/PolicyMo > dules yet > > (my package predates that document by several weeks), but > should be too > > difficult to adapt if someone is interested. > > > > (This is my second try to post here as my last message seems to have > > been eaten by the moderation system.) > > > > Gruß, > > > > > - From a quick read of the Wiki, it looks like there are packages that > fail to build on FC5 hosts due to policy problems (I didn't realize > that). This means to me that we should add a loadable policy > module as > part of the mock package. > > Seth, Michael, Dan, et al, what do you guys think?
I think it would be a good idea to package an selinux policy directly in with the mock package. This would give people a good starting place for tweaking if they have problems, and encourage them to send their fixes upstream. Hans policy might be a good starting point if it passes review by somebody who knows more about selinux than I do. -- Michael -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
