On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 11:20 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 04:24, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > I checked iso/pkgorder-ia64. It didn't have bash. I retried pkgorder > > manually, the output still didn't include bash. Then, I move all rpm from > > Fedora to Fedora/RPMS, and reran pkgorder. The new result had bash. > > Interesting. Sounds like maybe anaconda in FC6 isn't quite setup to handle > things under Fedora/ rather than Fedora/RPMS. I'll talk with the anaconda > folks. Unfortunately I haven't been able to duplicate this when spinning > x86_64 releases. After moving RPM files to Fedora/RPMS, the pkgorder result is correct, and directory os-disc1/Fedora/RPMS also has rpm bash, but the installation from the new images still reports lots of %post and %pre errors.
/root/install.log showed anaconda didn't follow the sequence produced by pkgorder to install rpms. I checked os-disc1/repodata/primary.xml.gz and the rpm sequence was exatcly the same sequence of pkgorder. Yanmin > > -- > Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
