rob myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > why not have mash write a signed rpm out instead of just warning users > when a package has cached signatures, but no signed rpm? > > lightly tested patch attached.
That would require the user running mash to authenticate to koji with a fairly high level of privelege, which seemed somewhat outside of the scope of it. Bill -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
