On Monday 02 July 2007 00:31:15 William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 wrote: > As packages are updated, they can grow dependencies. An example is that > libpurple now requires libhowl.so.o, found in avahi-compat-howl. Yet, > Pungi doesn't complain about the missing package. In the logs, I find > that when libpurple is examined, there's a list of dependencies, but > libhowl.so.0 is nowhere to be found. Where does Pungi get its dependency > info? One would think that it comes from the metadata in the repo, which > is local, in my case.
Gets it from the repo yes. There is a yum bug, fixed by 3.2.1 I do believe, that would make yum sometimes not complain about missing deps. Also look in your logs for WARNINGS regarding missing deps. I fixed pungi's reporting of missing deps recently. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
pgpDKSXE6fCl6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
