On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 10:51 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 02 July 2007 10:49:54 Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > > For subversion, a path plus a revision number would be sufficient. Tags > > in subversion are really just a convention. Unless you put some code > > into a pre-commit hook to prohibit it, tags can be modified just like > > any other directory in subversion. Unfortunately the same can be said > > of CVS tags. > > Yes, I'm wondering why suddenly it would be not necessary to provide this > convenience to developers, so that they'd have to guess at which path/rev# > was used to build a particular nvr.
we have only svn revision numbers. noone here seems to miss the nvr tag. in other words, it is a convenience we haven't really needed or used, and of course YMMV. rob. -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
