On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:06:25 +0200 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's just something to think about whether this is wanted at all - > with the current Fedora release cycles it doesn't hurt to add a new > arch to devel only. But if koji is used for RHEL or other longer-cycle > products not being able to add an arch for a released product (or > having to rebuild everything for all other arches as well due to > artificial release bumps) could become an issue. In RHEL at least we'd want to rebuild the package anyway. You can't come along 4 months or 2 years later to request that another arch be done of that build, unless you can generate a repodata set that matched the original repodata set and all the original used packages to build your package 4 months or 2 years ago. Buildroot content changes over time and you don't want 3 of your arches using one set of build tools and your new arch using potentially vastly different ones. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
