On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 20:49 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 18:13 -0600, Allen Rohner wrote: > > Thanks for the help. I'm able to get farther now. It doesn't really > > make sense to me why the list is the way it is. Is that truly the > > minimal set of packages? Why do we need iscsi-initiator-utils and > > vncserver to build a working ISO? This process would be significantly > > easier if the (true) minimum set of packages was documented somewhere, > > or even better, if pungi warned that you are missing packages X,Y,Z > > necessary to get a working build. I would offer to make a patch, but I > > don't know what the set is. > > That depends on if you want to install to iscsi, or support vnc > installs. Again, because pungi doesn't split out what you need to > compose the install media vs what you have as install choices on the > media, the media can get a bit bloaty. I just haven't come up with a > good way of expressing one vs the other.
One way might be to use the support that now exists in buildinstall to point at a repository. Then you could be running buildinstall against the repository you're pulling from and then your pungi'd tree would just have the packages you care about Jeremy -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
