On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 09:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday 02 June 2008, Paul B Schroeder wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 08:25 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > On Monday 02 June 2008, Paul B Schroeder wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 22:16 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Paul B Schroeder > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Rebuilding the rpm database seems to fix this, but it's a pain to > > > > > > be sure. Any ideas as to why I'm seeing this corruption when > > > > > > creating an i386 mock chroot from a x86_64 system? > > > > > > > > > > This is normal and expected. You created the rpmdb with x86_64 rpm, > > > > > and are accessing it with i386 rpm. The Berkeley DB format is > > > > > different based on the arch of the creating machine, therefore > > > > > generates the database differently on the two platforms. If I plan > > > > > on doing anything in a chroot (especially a non-native arch one) > > > > > other than building a SRPM, the first thing that happens is to rm -f > > > > > /var/lib/rpm/__db*. Don't worry, this got me the first time too (and > > > > > is fatal to a pungi compose) :) > > > > > > > > Ah.. I see.. I would think there would be some way to tell it to > > > > create the DB in i386 format though? Is there an environment variable > > > > or something that can be set? > > > > > > No, the hosts rpm is used to populate the chroot. when you enter the > > > chroot you can delete /var/lib/rpm/__db* and things will work. > > > > > > You get the same issues with building say F-7 chroots on a F-9 host where > > > the chroot has a different version of the the database than the host. > > > > I understand how it's working. (Although, I didn't know Berkely DB had > > diff formats for diff archs beforehand) But I was hoping there might be > > a way (in my Makefiles) to tell my x86_64 host's rpm to always operate > > in i386 mode. > > > > I can live with it, but I am setting up a build environment for other > > (read less Linux literate) folks to use. I'd like to head off any > > forthcoming confusion if possible. > > > > Cheers...Paul... > > Please dont CC me on list email just "reply to list" > Oops.. Apologies..
> you could try run setarch i386 before the mock command. > Yea.. I tried that one already.. Didn't work. -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
