Greetings,

It seems that DIST_DEFINES is duplicated in Makefile.common, being
included in RPM_DEFINES and then also being used in places where
RPM_DEFINES is used (directly, and as a part of RPM_WITH_DIRS).

Does the attached patch look reasonably sane?

Disclaimer: I've had a few rum-based beverages this evening and I
might be missing some important reason for the duplication.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the
nature of the Unknowable.
    -- Ambrose Bierce, The Enlarged Devil's Dictionary, 1906

Index: Makefile.common
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/common/Makefile.common,v
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -u -p -r1.105 Makefile.common
--- Makefile.common     3 Jul 2008 19:15:27 -0000       1.105
+++ Makefile.common     10 Jul 2008 01:47:05 -0000
@@ -94,11 +94,11 @@ ifndef NAME
 $(error "You can not run this Makefile without having NAME defined")
 endif
 ifndef VERSION
-VERSION := $(shell rpm $(RPM_DEFINES) $(DIST_DEFINES) -q --qf "%{VERSION}\n" 
--specfile $(SPECFILE)| head -1)
+VERSION := $(shell rpm $(RPM_DEFINES) -q --qf "%{VERSION}\n" --specfile 
$(SPECFILE)| head -1)
 endif
 # the release of the package
 ifndef RELEASE
-RELEASE := $(shell rpm $(RPM_DEFINES) $(DIST_DEFINES) -q --qf "%{RELEASE}\n" 
--specfile $(SPECFILE)| head -1)
+RELEASE := $(shell rpm $(RPM_DEFINES) -q --qf "%{RELEASE}\n" --specfile 
$(SPECFILE)| head -1)
 endif
 # this is used in make patch, maybe make clean eventually.
 # would be nicer to autodetermine from the spec file...
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ check: test-srpm
 
 ## use this to build an srpm locally
 srpm: sources $(TARGETS)
-       $(RPM_WITH_DIRS) $(DIST_DEFINES) --nodeps -bs $(SPECFILE)
+       $(RPM_WITH_DIRS) --nodeps -bs $(SPECFILE)
 
 test-srpm: srpm
 

Attachment: pgpE60kPwn1bK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list

Reply via email to