On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:06 -0400, Mike McLean wrote: > While certain tools might theoretically be able to look up the matching > srpm, check this data, and enforce it in some way for the built rpms, I > don't believe there is any way to signal such restrictions only for a > sub-package. In any case, such use seems a little fragile and sketchy to me. > > I'm not that familiar with Pungi's capabilities. Can it be told to > special-case situations like this with a config?
Hrm, I need to look up what mash does again, as mash does notice and not put ExcludeArch packages (even noarch ones) where they don't belong. But you're right, it may be on an srpm level not a subpackage level. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
