Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
we have revisor on F-9 ignoring the requested arch and building the
spin based on the host arch only - is this a known issue? The
revisor-made spin we have doesn't work on i586 :-/
more details below...
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Martin Langhoff
<[email protected]> wrote:
the olpc XS spin is hitting a problem installing on i586s (and that
includes our own XO). The problem seems to be well known -- anaconda
composes based on the arch of the build host rather than on the arch
requested, as described in:
https://fedorahosted.org/revisor/wiki/AnacondaUpdates#TheUnabletoInstalloni586Example2
The revisor conf says "architecture=386", yet we are getting _only_
openssl i686 on the iso, which won't get installed on 586, so
everything breaks on the (partially installed) machine.
I'm away from my buildbox today -- Jerry's been testing and reports
that pungi-driven composes also put an openssl-i386 on the iso, while
revisor-driven composes don't. So it sounds like the problem is
perhaps in how revisor drives anaconda?
Any hints or ideas? It seems to be a well known problem...?
(the compose host is a Fedora-9 box, that follows updates.newkey)
Hi Martin,
Since your first mail, I've tried to reproduce this. I have no problems
producing installation media with both openssl.i386 and openssl.i686 in
the RPM payload (Packages/ directory) - with either respin mode or
without, which I was thinking may have been the issue. This however is
using a fresh git clone off of master, not the released version of
Revisor on Fedora 9.
Are you composing Live media by any chance? I can see how there is no
.i386 version of openssl installed.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
