Hi Steve, I would certainly support this if you (or anyone) wants to submit this functionality as a patch vs trunk. It would be a great request to get closed. I think doing it as RELS-INT (instead of extending RELS-EXT) would be best, since I know of several folks who have already created RELS-INT datastreams in anticipation of this capability.
- Chris On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Steve Bayliss <[email protected]> wrote: > I see the feature request for internal datastream relations is still open at > https://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCSUPPORT-21 > > We have in the past made modifications to Fedora source essentially to > support this for a few projects. > > Are there any more thoughts on the likely direction this will take, ie > RELS-INT vs modifying RELS-EXT validation to allow datastream assertions? > > We'd like to make sure that anything we do in the future stays aligned to > the likely direction the Fedora codebase is going to take. > > I don't have a strong view on which approach would be best - although going > down the RELS-INT route would probably be a little bit easier to work with. > > Regards > Steve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers
