Chris,

My only concern is with the "demo"" prefix:  many people make use of 
these external web services in production environments, when suitable 
and useful;  giving them the name "demo"" may lead to unnecessary 
confusion if they can be used for purposes other than demonstration and 
testing.

-- Scott

Chris Wilper wrote:
> I have a proposal for maven module/artifactId renaming that I'd like
> to get reactions on.
> 
> Take a look at our current hierarchy:
> 
> https://fedora-commons.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/fedora-commons/fedora/trunk/
> 
> Here's what I'm proposing we change, in a nutshell:
> 
> fedorarepo-admin-client -> fedorarepo-client-admin
> fedorarepo-messaging-client -> fedorarepo-client-messaging
> 
> fedorarepo-localservices -> fedorarepo-demoservice
> fedorarepo-fop -> fedorarepo-demoservice-fop
> fedorarepo-saxon -> fedorarepo-demoservice-saxon
> fedorarepo-imagemanip -> fedorarepo-demoservice-imagemanip
> 
> This renaming offers two improvements over what we've got today.  It:
> 1) Consistently names the submodules according to the same hierarchy
> implied by the module structure
> 2) Renames "localservices" to "demoservice".  This makes this
> container module's name
> a) singular, to be consistent with the fedorarepo-client container
> module naming, and
> b) start with "demo" instead of "local", which I think is a more
> meaningful name, and lines up nicely with the related module,
> fedorarepo-democontent
> 
> On a separate note, I'm starting to question whether a "module
> hierarchy" is really useful for the two modules we're currently doing
> it in...they're bare-bones poms at the moment, and if the name already
> implies the hierarchy, I'm not seeing the value. That's not to say a
> 3-or-more-level hierarchy of modules doesn't make sense in some cases,
> but I'm just not seeing it here. Anyone else have thoughts on that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> P.S. Thanks again to Andrew and Dan for doing the heavy lifting in the
> maven migration so far.  I really think we're in a better place now,
> and it will be very gratifying to do a non-ant release soon.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers


-- 
Scott Prater
Library, Instructional, and Research Applications (LIRA)
Division of Information Technology (DoIT)
University of Wisconsin - Madison
[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers

Reply via email to