We are using METS 1.0 within our Fedora repository and in SIP preparation tools. The Fedora support for METS is on ingest (and possibly export) of objects, but that doesn't prevent you from having METS 1.0 data streams in your object model. For instance, while we use METS in our Fedora objects, we use FOXML 1.1 for ingest to Fedora. In our case the METS structMap is packaged in a data stream.
I hope this helps, Greg On 10/04/2010 07:38 AM, Matteo Boschini wrote: > Hi all, > > we are setting up a repository using METS. > We had designed the system prior to FC 3.4 release, and were planning > to use METS-1.0, because of a few features taht are in Mets-1.0 but > not in METS.1.1 (e.g structural map). > > Now, on FC 3.4 we can find only METS-1.1 mentioned. Does this mean > that METS-1.0 will no longer be supported (may be in FC 3.X, FC 4) ? > If so, we'd move to METS 1.1. > > Any idea/cooment is warmly welcome.... > > > best regards, -- ___ Gregory N. Jansen Developer - Carolina Digital Repository UNC Chapel Hill Libraries ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
