Chris Wilper <cwil...@...> writes:

> 
> I don't have a solution, but this sounds like it may be related to FCREPO-833:
> 
> https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-833
> 
> We were just talking about 833 on this week's dev call and started to
> suspect that SLF4J wasn't initializing properly (particularly, the
> logging is behaving as though it's configured for DEBUG...which seems
> to be provoking a bug in Mulgara).
> 
> The "class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings" message is a good
> clue, I think.  I'll link to this thread from the issue...I know a few
> of the committers are looking at it now.
> 
> I wonder if the version of Tomcat that you're using also has an SLF4J
> binding in the common lib area somewhere....
> 
> - Chris



Hi Chris,

Thanks for the reply. 

Here's what's in my common/lib (there's nothing in common/endorsed):

[ant].jar               
derbyclient-10.5.3.0_1.jar  
jdtcore.jar       
mysql-connector-java-5.1.6.jar
[commons-collections].jar  
[jaf].jar                 
[jndi].jar        
naming-factory.jar
[commons-dbcp].jar 
[jasper5-compiler].jar      
[jsp].jar         
naming-resources.jar
[commons-el].jar           
[jasper5-runtime].jar       
[jta].jar         
[servlet].jar
[commons-logging-api].jar  
[javamail].jar              
mckoidb.jar
[commons-pool].jar         
[jdbc-stdext].jar           
[mx4j][mx4j].jar

It really doesn't seem like any of these would have SLF4J bindings. I've tried
updating the commons-logging, but still the same results. 

One thing I am curious about...the SLF4J manual (
http://www.slf4j.org/manual.html)  says to only include one binding in the class
path.  However, in the WEB-INF/lib directory of Fedora, I have: 
slf4j-jdk14-1.5.2.jar
slf4j-log4j12-1.5.2.jar
logback-classic-0.9.18.jar

I think maybe two of these have to go...however, I can't tell which ones. I've
played around with it a bit...removing all but the log4j seems to kill the crazy
output to catalina.out, but still does not append to fedora.out. 

Thanks again for the help...the output to the log is actually a  problem, since
it's now literally generating over 1g of log / day. 

best,chris. 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to