Hi Steve, I don't quite understand this whole resolver thing... I'll have to look further into how Mulgara works or just try changing the triple store (I'm more familiar with Virtuoso and its <bif:contains> function provides similar functionality than the full-text model). But this is useful information, I though that the limitation on literals was on the Fedora side, but now I see the Lucene model in Mulgara is the one only accepting literals.
Anyway, having read your response to my other mail on semantic relationships I see that this will matter little once Fedora accepts nested relations (with different subject). Do you have any idea when this is to be released or implemented in the trunk? Alex Steve Bayliss, 13-12-2010 08:28: > Hi Alex > > You're correct that the full text index only indexes literals. > > You might want to take a look at the Mulgara prefix resolver as this handles > URIs as well as literals: > > http://mulgara.org/mulgara#PrefixModel A graph containing virtual statement > about the characters prefixing string literals, or URI references. > > Probably the Mulgara lists are the best place for further information on > this. > > Regards > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Rodriguez Lopez [mailto:alo...@flordeutopia.pt] > Sent: 10 December 2010 16:03 > To: fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [fcrepo-user] RI / Mulgara: Enable full-text indexing for URIs > too(not just literals) > > > Hi! > > I noticed that, when indexing, Mulgara indexes URIs as well as literal > values of the triples. > > But, when enabling full-text indexing, the full-text index only gets > *literal* values indexed. > > Now I would like Mulgara to full-text index URIs too, so later I can > perform searches on parts of URIs (I'm adding URIs that happen to have > descriptive names so this would be useful). > > Any idea how to get this done? (Without having to add an additional > relationship as literal for each URI-relationship I add to have it > indexed in the full-text model). > > Any directions to do this myself? > > Thanks! > > Regards, > Alex > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, > new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, > OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-users mailing list > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, > new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, > OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-users mailing list > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
