Thank you Richard We have our RELS-EXT as such
<rdf:RDF xmlns:fedora-model="info:fedora/fedora-system:def/model#" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"; xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";> <rdf:Description rdf:about="info:fedora/demo:22"> <oai:itemID>demo:22</oai:itemID> <fedora-model:hasModel rdf:resource="info:fedora/fedora-system:ServiceDefinition-3.0"></fedora-model:hasModel> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> We are testing this locally that is why we have pid only in line <oai:itemID>demo:22</oai:itemID> Also in the proai.properties file we have driver.fedora.md.formats = test_format formatX formatY oai_dc FGDC driver.fedora.md.format.FGDC.dissType = info:fedora/*/RELS-EXT But still the ListMetadataFormats query only gives oai_dc. Is there anything that we are missing. Biva -----Original Message----- From: Richard Green [mailto:r.gr...@hull.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 4:36 AM To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users. Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] question on OAI-PMH Many repositories do not expose *all* their content for harvesting. The oai item ID in the RELS-EXT is the hook that causes PROAI to index an item and serve it up. Your (2) below relates to OAI-PMH harvesting sets so that people can harvest (say) just your physics content rather than all of your exposed content. These sets are optional. Without the RELS-EXT entries PROAI will not expose anything. Richard -----Original Message----- From: Shrestha, Biva [mailto:shrest...@ornl.gov] Sent: 15 June 2011 9:59 PM To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users. Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] question on OAI-PMH Hello Richard, First of all thank you so much for being patient. I am not clear yet as to why we need to add entries to the RDF. In the documentation of OAI-PMH (hxxps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCSVCS/OAI+Provider+Service+1 . 2 . 1) it clearly says that it: 1) Supports any metadata format available through your Fedora Repository via a Datastream or dissemination service 2) Supports sets that are expressed as RDF relationships in your digital objects' RELS-EXT Datastreams as exposed via the Resource Index Are these two same thing or linked. Because we are trying to achieve the first one here not the second one. Again I really appreciate your patience and I would really appreciate if you could explain as to why we would need those entries in RELS-EXT when we are trying to achieve the support number one and not two. thank you so much Biva ________________________________________ From: Richard Green [R.Green@hull . ac . uk] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:26 AM To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users. Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] question on OAI-PMH Two things spring to mind. First (apologies for asking) you have put the appropriate oai entries into the RELS-EXT of each object haven't you (<oai:itemID>)? Second, I wonder if there is some case sensitivity - you have both FGDC and fgdc: I wonder if they should all match? Try also hxxp://localhost:8080/fedora/oai?verb=ListMetadataFormats and see if it returns fgdc. R -----Original Message----- From: ivashrestha [mailto:shrest...@ornl.gov] Sent: 14 June 2011 8:35 PM To: fedora-commons-users@lists . sourceforge . net Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] question on OAI-PMH Hi Richard, We have a datastream with DSID "FGDC.xml" and content as follows: <metadata> [xml-content] </metadata> We want to expose this datastream using OAI-PMH support. And the changes that we added to the proai.properties file are driver . fedora . md.formats = test_format formatX formatY oai_dc fgdc driver . fedora . md . format . fgdc.dissType = info:fedora/*/FGDC.xml After these changes the datastream is still not being exposed because when we do a hxxp://localhost:8080/fedora/oai?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=metadat a we get <OAI-PMH xsi:schemaLocation="hxxp://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ hxxp://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2011-06-1 4T11:12:25Z</responseDate><request verb="ListRecords">hxxp://localhost:8080/fedora/oai</request><error code="cannotDisseminateFormat">Repository does not provide that format in OAI-PMH responses.</error></OAI-PMH> Is there something we are missing? thank you so much Biva -- View this message in context: hxxp://fedora-commons.1317035.n2.nabble.com/fcrepo-user-question-on-OAI- PMH-tp6204787p6475611.html Sent from the Fedora Commons Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. hxxp://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists . sourceforge . net hxxps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. hxxp://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists . sourceforge . net hxxps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
