Hello Stephen,

Using "urn:fedora:names:fedora:2.1:subject:role" helped a lot and now
the policy works as intended.

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Stephen Bayliss
<stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net> wrote:
> Hi Tomasz
>
> The elements "AnyResource" "AnyAction" etc are not valid in the XACML 2.0
> schema - to specify "Any..." just omit that section (so to specify any
> resource, omit the Resources section entirely).  If you take a look at the
> Fedora log you should see some kind of validation error messages when you
> save the policy.  It might be worthwhile increasing the logging level for
> FeSL-related messages whilst you are testing this in any case.
>
> Could you paste in the relevant section(s) of config-attribute-finder.xml?
>
> Also could you paste in the RELS-EXT datastream from the data object you are
> testing this on?
>
> The value of the Subject AttributeID you should use for fedoraRole is
> "urn:fedora:names:fedora:2.1:subject:role" (not "fedoraRole" as per your 2nd
> example).
>
> Regards
> Steve
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tomasz Cielecki [mailto:tom...@ostebaronen.dk]
>> Sent: 27 June 2011 15:55
>> To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.
>> Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Using information
>> fromdatastreamstocreateFeSLpolicies.
>>
>>
>> Hello again,
>>
>> So I have found a way to get the organization id as a value
>> in the fedoraRole attribute which resides in the subject. And
>> I have made a general FESLPOLICY which allows a user with a
>> specific role to read the repository.
>>
>> Now I want the user to be allowed to read objects belonging
>> to her organization. I have tried several ways with the same
>> result, that neither of the policies give me access to these objects.
>>
>> First approach:
>>
>> <Policy
>>         xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:policy:schema:os"
>>
>> xmlns:xacml-context="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os"
>>         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>>
>> xsi:schemaLocation="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:policy:schema:os
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/2.0/access_control-xacml-2.0-
>> policy-schema-os.xsd
>>
>> urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/2.0/access_control-xacml-2.0-
>> context-schema-os.xsd"
>>         PolicyId="access-organisation"
>>
>> RuleCombiningAlgId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:rule-combinin
>> g-algorithm:first-applicable">
>>         <Description>A policy allowing users to see all of
>> organization 200 objects.</Description>
>>         <Target>
>>               <Resources>
>>                               <Resource>
>>                                       <ResourceMatch
>> MatchId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:string-equal">
>>                                               <AttributeValue
>> DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";>
>>                                                       200
>>                                               </AttributeValue>
>>
>> <ResourceAttributeDesignator
>> AttributeId="http://kemibrug.dk/k2/rdf#orgid";
>> DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"/>
>>                                       </ResourceMatch>
>>                               </Resource>
>>                       </Resources>
>>                       <Actions>
>>                               <AnyAction/>
>>                       </Actions>
>>         </Target>
>>         <Rule Effect="Permit" RuleId="1" />
>> </Policy>
>>
>> This does nothing. When I search for NOTE:* in the
>> /fedora/objects I get no results.
>>
>> The second approach I tried was:
>> <Policy
>>         xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:policy:schema:os"
>>
>> xmlns:xacml-context="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os"
>>         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>>
>> xsi:schemaLocation="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:policy:schema:os
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/2.0/access_control-xacml-2.0-
>> policy-schema-os.xsd
>>
>> urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/2.0/access_control-xacml-2.0-
>> context-schema-os.xsd"
>>         PolicyId="access-organisation"
>>
>> RuleCombiningAlgId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:rule-combinin
>> g-algorithm:first-applicable">
>>         <Description>A policy allowing users of an
>> organisation to do anything with their own objects.</Description>
>>         <Target>
>>               <Resources>
>>                               <AnyResource/>
>>                       </Resources>
>>                       <Actions>
>>                               <AnyAction/>
>>                       </Actions>
>>         </Target>
>>       <Rule Effect="Permit" RuleId="1">
>>               <Description>Permit subject to access target if
>> target is in the organisation subject is part of</Description>
>>               <Condition>
>>                       <Apply
>> FunctionId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:string-at-le
>> ast-one-member-of">
>>                               <ResourceAttributeDesignator
>> AttributeId="http://kemibrug.dk/k2/rdf#orgid";
>> DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"/>
>>                               <SubjectAttributeDesignator
>> AttributeId="fedoraRole" MustBePresent="false"
>> DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"/>
>>                       </Apply>
>>               </Condition>
>>         </Rule>
>> </Policy>
>>
>> This results in the same thing as the first approach. No
>> objects appear when I search for Notes...
>>
>> I have remembered to add the attribute designator in
>> pdp/conf/config-attribute-finder.xml
>>
>> Can someone see what I am doing wrong here?
>>
>> The users attributes (from /fedora/user) appear as follows:
>> <user id="KED">
>>       <attribute name="Host"/>
>>       <attribute name="role">
>>               <value>200</value>
>>               <value>authenticated user</value>
>>               <value>local editor</value>
>>       </attribute>
>>       <attribute name="fedoraRole">
>>               <value>200</value>
>>               <value>authenticated user</value>
>>               <value>local editor</value>
>>       </attribute>
>> </user>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Stephen Bayliss
>> <stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net> wrote:
>> > Hi Tomasz
>> >
>> > Thanks for raising the JIRA issue.
>> >
>> > There are a couple of implementation choices for this that I can see
>> > 1) have the attributes added by the PEP
>> > 2) implement via an AttributeFinderModule.
>> >
>> > I would tend towards the latter, though implementation via
>> the former
>> > might be easier.
>> >
>> > If you take a look at
>> >
>> org.fcrepo.server.security.xacml.pdp.finder.attribute.LDAPAttributeFin
>> > der.LD
>> > APAttributeFinder in fcrepo-security-pdp you will see an
>> > AttributeFinderModule that deals with subject attributes.
>> >
>> > The attributes are in fact picked up by the JAAS module - see
>> > org.fcrepo.server.security.jaas.auth.module.XmlUsersFileModule -
>> > you'll see them added around line 213.
>> >
>> > So the question is how to build some kind of bridge from
>> this to a new
>> > AttributeFinderModule.
>> >
>> > Also you'll see how the current subject attributes are
>> added into the
>> > request by the PEP around line 93 of
>> > org.fcrepo.server.security.xacml.pep.rest.filters.AbstractFilter -
>> > this may give some clues.  Though adding them in at this point is
>> > option (1) which I think is less preferable to option (2).
>> >
>> > Whichever is the option, some configuration will be required to map
>> > the name given in the fedora-users.xml file to a XACML subject
>> > attribute ID>
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Steve
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Tomasz Cielecki [mailto:tom...@ostebaronen.dk]
>> >> Sent: 15 June 2011 12:50
>> >> To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.
>> >> Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Using information from
>> >> datastreamstocreateFeSLpolicies.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Stephen,
>> >>
>> >> Where should I look if I want to take a shot at allowing access to
>> >> other subject attributes in FeSL?
>> >>
>> >> I see there is a lot of related code in fcrepo-security,
>> but not sure
>> >> where to start.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stephen Bayliss
>> >> <stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Tomasz
>> >> >
>> >> >> Being able to only access fedoraRole from FeSL is indeed a
>> >> >> barrier!
>> >> >
>> >> > That is the case currently - if you'd like to be able to
>> >> access other
>> >> > subject attributes maybe you'd like to raise a JIRA ticket
>> >> for this at
>> >> > https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO?
>> >> >
>> >> > In the meantime you are restricted to using a fedoraRole
>> to make it
>> >> > available as a subject attribute ID
>> >> > "urn:fedora:names:fedora:2.1:subject:role"
>> >> >
>> >> > To expose the target of your relationship as a resource
>> attribute,
>> >> > you'll need to define it in
>> >> > $FEDORA_HOME/pdp/conf/config-attribute-finder.xml.
>> >> >
>> >> > You would need something like:
>> >> >
>> >> > <attribute designator="resource"
>> >> > name="http://kemibrug.dk/k2/relations#belongsToOrg"; />
>> >> >
>> >> > This makes the value of the target of the relationship
>> >> available as a
>> >> > XACML resource attribute with an ID the same as your
>> relationship
>> >> > name; ie "http://kemibrug.dk/k2/relations#belongsToOrg"; so
>> >> you can use
>> >> > this in your policies (in the forthcoming 3.5 release this is
>> >> > enhanced, see
>> >> >
>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORADEV/FeSL+Authorization -
>> >> > particularly you can define the XACML resource attribute ID
>> >> > independently of the relationship URI)
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd recommend you use the same value for your subject
>> attribute (ie
>> >> > fedoraRole) as the target of the relationship as this
>> will make the
>> >> > comparison in the policy easier.  The value type of the resource
>> >> > attribute is actually treated as a string (not a URI) so
>> you'd use
>> >> > this value as your fedoraRole.
>> >> >
>> >> > Your policy should contain a Rule element with a Condition
>> >> to specify
>> >> > the comparison - if you look at the example right at the end of
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORADEV/FeSL+Authorization this
>> >> > should guide you - in your case you'll be comparing the
>> >> subject role
>> >> > (as per the
>> >> > example) with your newly-defined resource attribute ID.
>> >> >
>> >> > Steve
>> >> >
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Tomasz Cielecki [mailto:tom...@ostebaronen.dk]
>> >> >> Sent: 14 June 2011 16:40
>> >> >> To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Using information from datastreams
>> >> >> tocreateFeSLpolicies.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In this case the user with the k2Org attribute with value
>> >> 236 would
>> >> >> not be allowed to view the ressource with the relation
>> >> >> k2rel:belongsToOrg with URI info:fedora/org:243. If it would be
>> >> >> easier this could also be stored as a string in the RELS-EXT.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lets say the values matched, then the user would be able
>> >> to view the
>> >> >> object and its methods. As simple as that. But I don't
>> >> understand how
>> >> >> to access information stored in RELS-EXT from a FeSL policy.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Being able to only access fedoraRole from FeSL is indeed a
>> >> >> barrier!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Steve Bayliss
>> >> >> <stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi Tomasz
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm not entirely clear on the policy condition you want to
>> >> >> implement.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I see in your RDF:
>> >> >> >>               <k2rel:belongsToOrg
>> >> >> >> rdf:resource="info:fedora/org:243"/>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And in your user attributes:
>> >> >> >>   <attribute name="k2Org">
>> >> >> >>     <value>236</value>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > So I'm not clear, as these values are different, what
>> >> the condition
>> >> >> > would be to allow access.  Also one's a URI and one's
>> a string.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As far as I know (I'll need to look at the code to check),
>> >> >> I believe
>> >> >> > only fedoraRole subject attributes get passed through to FeSL
>> >> >> > currently, so that may be one barrier.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regards
>> >> >> > Steve
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >> From: Tomasz Cielecki [mailto:tom...@ostebaronen.dk]
>> >> >> >> Sent: 10 June 2011 05:26
>> >> >> >> To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Using information from
>> >> datastreams to
>> >> >> >> createFeSLpolicies.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hello Stephen,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So lets say I have a note object I talked about with
>> following
>> >> >> >> RELS-EXT data stream: <foxml:datastream ID="RELS-EXT"
>> >> >> >> CONTROL_GROUP="X">
>> >> >> >>       <foxml:datastreamVersion
>> >> >> >> FORMAT_URI="info:fedora/fedora-system:FedoraRELSExt-1.0"
>> >> >> >> ID="RELS-EXT.0" MIMETYPE="application/rdf+xml" LABEL="RDF
>> >> >> Statements
>> >> >> >> about this object" SIZE="752"
>> >> CREATED="2011-04-01T00:00:00.000Z">
>> >> >> >>         <foxml:xmlContent>
>> >> >> >>           <rdf:RDF
>> >> >> >> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:rel="info:fedora/fedora-system:def/relations-external#"
>> >> >> >> xmlns:k2rel="http://kemibrug.dk/k2/relations#";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:k2rdf="http://kemibrug.dk/k2/rdf#";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/";>
>> >> >> >>             <rdf:Description
>> >> >> >> rdf:about="info:fedora/note:78734">
>> >> >> >>               <k2rel:belongsToOrg
>> >> >> >> rdf:resource="info:fedora/org:243"/>
>> >> >> >>               <k2rel:belongsToKBA
>> >> >> >> rdf:resource="info:fedora/localreg:15989"/>
>> >> >> >>               <k2rdf:type>31</k2rdf:type>
>> >> >> >>               <k2rdf:value>R38</k2rdf:value>
>> >> >> >>             </rdf:Description>
>> >> >> >>           </rdf:RDF>
>> >> >> >>         </foxml:xmlContent>
>> >> >> >>       </foxml:datastreamVersion>
>> >> >> >>     </foxml:datastream>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Where I now have defined an organisation with the relation
>> >> >> >> belongsToOrg. And I have a user with following
>> >> attributes: <user
>> >> >> >> id="toci">
>> >> >> >>   <attribute name="k2Org">
>> >> >> >>     <value>236</value>
>> >> >> >>   </attribute>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>   <attribute name="k2Host">
>> >> >> >>     <value>127.0.0.1</value>
>> >> >> >>   </attribute>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>   <attribute name="role">
>> >> >> >>     <value>administrator</value>
>> >> >> >>   </attribute>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>   <attribute name="fedoraRole">
>> >> >> >>     <value>administrator</value>
>> >> >> >>   </attribute>
>> >> >> >> </user>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> What should I do to give the user access to the note
>> >> >> object by using
>> >> >> >> the k2Org in the user attributes?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Stephen Bayliss
>> >> >> >> <stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Hi Tomasz
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Basing policies directly on XML content (and restricting
>> >> >> access to
>> >> >> >> > XML
>> >> >> >> > content) is part of the XACML 2.0 spec as part of the
>> >> >> Hierarchical
>> >> >> >> Resource
>> >> >> >> > Profile -
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/2.0/access_control-xacml-2.0-hier
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> >> profile-s
>> >> >> >> > pec-os.pdf
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > However this is not implemented in FeSL (it would be
>> >> >> interesting to
>> >> >> >> > know
>> >> >> >> if
>> >> >> >> > there's a general need for this).
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > It is possible to define XACML Resource attributes based
>> >> >> on object
>> >> >> >> > and datastream properties that are specified in
>> RELS-EXT and
>> >> >> >> > RELS-INT datastreams - the configuration for this is in
>> >> >> >> > $FEDORA_HOME/pdp/conf/config-attribute-finder.xml - so
>> >> >> if you can
>> >> >> >> > get
>> >> >> >> your
>> >> >> >> > attributes into RELS-EXT/RELS-INT then maybe this is
>> >> a solution.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > The functionality of this has been enhanced for
>> >> Fedora 3.5, some
>> >> >> >> > draft documentation for this is at
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORADEV/FeSL+Authorization -
>> >> >> >> > this
>> >> >> >> may
>> >> >> >> > help you as the basic simple relationship-based
>> >> attributes are
>> >> >> >> > present
>> >> >> >> ni
>> >> >> >> > Fedora 3.4.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > FYI there's also some draft documentation on
>> >> >> installation for 3.5
>> >> >> >> > at
>> >> >> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORADEV/FeSL+Installation;
>> >> >> >> > feedback welcomed on both of these.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Steve
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >> >> From: Tomasz Cielecki [mailto:tom...@ostebaronen.dk]
>> >> >> >> >> Sent: 30 May 2011 14:29
>> >> >> >> >> To: fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: [fcrepo-user] Using information from
>> datastreams to
>> >> >> >> >> create FeSLpolicies.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Hello fcrepo-users,
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I find it a bit hard to understand how to write
>> >> >> policies for FeSL
>> >> >> >> >> to authorize against attributes found in an object's
>> >> >> data stream.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> For instance I have an object called note:1 which
>> has the DC
>> >> >> >> >> record an RELS-EXT record and a data stream called
>> >> >> content, which
>> >> >> >> >> content is in XML format.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Is it possible to access data stored in the content
>> >> data stream
>> >> >> >> >> through a policy? For instance I want to access an
>> >> >> organization id
>> >> >> >> >> stored in that content data stream, which I want
>> to match a
>> >> >> >> >> against a users attributes to see if the user is
>> >> >> allowed to access
>> >> >> >> >> that object and its related objects.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Maybe the attributes should be placed elsewhere? How do
>> >> >> I access
>> >> >> >> >> them?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> If you could be so kind to give me some examples to
>> >> >> work with as I
>> >> >> >> >> find the ones in the wiki lacking or maybe I am
>> >> >> understanding them
>> >> >> >> >> incorrectly.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> With Best Regards
>> >> >> >> >> Tomasz Cielecki
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> ----------------
>> >> >> >> >> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing
>> >> >> security. With
>> >> >> >> >> the market-leading solution for virtual backup and
>> >> >> recovery, you
>> >> >> >> >> get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data
>> protection.
>> >> >> >> >> Download your free trial now.
>> >> >> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> >> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> >> >> >> >> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> >> > -----
>> >> >> >> ------
>> >> >> >> > Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual
>> >> >> environment with
>> >> >> >> vRanger.
>> >> >> >> > Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options
>> >> >> mean your data
>> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> safe,
>> >> >> >> > secure and there when you need it. Data protection
>> >> magic? Nope -
>> >> >> >> > It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
>> >> >> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> > Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> >> >> >> > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-user
>> >> >> >> > s
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Med Venlig Hilsen / With Best Regards
>> >> >> >> Tomasz Cielecki
>> >> >> >> http://ostebaronen.dk
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> -----
>> >> >> >> ----
>> >> >> >> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically
>> >> >> advanced content
>> >> >> >> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track
>> Changes, Inline
>> >> >> >> Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with
>> >> >> >> Accessibility
>> >> >> Checking.
>> >> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> >> >> >> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >> >>
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> > --------
>> >> >> > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced
>> >> >> > content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track
>> Changes,
>> >> >> > Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with
>> >> >> > Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> >> >> > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >> >
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-user
>> >> >> > s
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Med Venlig Hilsen / With Best Regards
>> >> >> Tomasz Cielecki
>> >> >> http://ostebaronen.dk
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> ----------------
>> >> >> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically
>> >> advanced content
>> >> >> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes,
>> >> Inline Image
>> >> >> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility
>> >> Checking.
>> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> >> >> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> -
>> >> > --------
>> >> > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced
>> >> > content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes,
>> >> > Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with
>> >> > Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> >> > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Med Venlig Hilsen / With Best Regards
>> >> Tomasz Cielecki
>> >> http://ostebaronen.dk
>> >>
>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> ----------------
>> >> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically
>> advanced content
>> >> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes,
>> Inline Image
>> >> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility
>> Checking.
>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> >> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > --------
>> > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
>> > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
>> > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Med Venlig Hilsen / With Best Regards
>> Tomasz Cielecki
>> http://ostebaronen.dk
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is
>> seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of
>> application performance, security
>> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
>> data and makes
>> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
>> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>



-- 
Med Venlig Hilsen / With Best Regards
Tomasz Cielecki
http://ostebaronen.dk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to