Hi Ben As far as I'm aware the basic OAI-PMH provider doesn't provide set information (though I haven't looked at the source code recently).
You might want to look at the PROAI-based OAI-PMH provider at https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCSVCS/OAI+Provider+Service+1.2.1 This does provide set information and is in general a lot more configurable than the basic service. Regards Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Companjen [mailto:bencompan...@gmail.com] > Sent: 08 October 2011 16:54 > To: Support and info exchange list for Fedora users. > Subject: [fcrepo-user] Does the Basic OAI-PMH Provider support sets? > > > Hi, > > Am I correct to understand (after browsing the source code) > that the Basic OAI-PMH provider will not return information > about sets at all? > > Should something about limitations be added to > https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA35/Basic+OAI-PMH+Prov > ider ? The page says it will respond to every valid request, > but it says nothing about limitations of the provider. It > could also provide a link to the OAI Provider service > https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCSVCS/OAI+Provider+Service+1.2.1 > > Any confirmation would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Ben > > On 31 August 2011 14:17, Ben Companjen <bencompan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > This is my first post to this list. I recently subscribed because I > > couldn't find the answer to my question online, although I am > > generally interested in using Fedora Commons. I installed > FC 3.5 on a > > Windows 7 machine in Tomcat 6.0.32 using MySQL 5.5.10 and > it works :) > > It's only for testing purposes. > > > > My question relates to the builtin OAI-PMH functionality. I > was hoping > > that putting objects in a Fedora collection object would show the > > collection object as an OAI-PMH set, but it doesn't. I get > an ListSets > > element that is not empty, but only contains a line break. > > > > I have three objects: photo:1, photo:2 and photocol:1. photo:1 and > > photo:2 are related to photocol:1 by "rel:isMemberOfCollection". > > photocol:1 has "rel:isCollection" true (as explained in the > FAQ) and > > "hasCollectionMember" photo:1 and photo:2 (because I thought/hoped > > that this would automatically let photocol:1 be recognized as > > collection, before I found out about rel:isCollection). > > > > Is this a known limitation, a bug, or am I doing something wrong? > > > > Regards, > > > > Ben Companjen > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is > seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of > application performance, security threats, fraudulent > activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of > it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-users mailing list > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
