Hi Asger

 

I've verified this, the 404 error has gone away.

 

It would be useful if there was any way to distinguish between the
non-existence of the target object vs the target object not having the
specified type - is this at all possible?

 

Thanks

Steve

 

  _____  

From: Stephen Bayliss [mailto:stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 7:30 PM
To: 'Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.'
Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models - validating typeof
relationship target gives 404 if target does not exist

 

Hi Asger - thanks for this.  Probably I won't get chance until early next
week to test it, but I do want to test it in any case.

 

Regards

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Asger Askov Blekinge [mailto:a...@statsbiblioteket.dk] 
Sent: 13 December 2011 15:52
To: fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models - validating type of
relationship target gives 404 if target does not exist

This branch should fix the problem
https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo/tree/fcrepo-1041

Steve, can you test it easily? Otherwise, I will do it.

Regards

On 12/13/2011 04:11 PM, Stephen Bayliss wrote: 

 <https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1041>
https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1041 raised for this. 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Bayliss [mailto:stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net] 
Sent: 13 December 2011 14:58
To: 'Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.'
Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models - validating typeof
relationship target gives 404 if target does not exist

Thanks Asger - it returns plain text of the missing object (but this was
from a browser, haven't tried requesting content type of text/xml).  I'll
raise a JIRA for this.

 

Cheers

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Asger Askov Blekinge [mailto:a...@statsbiblioteket.dk] 
Sent: 13 December 2011 14:25
To: fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models - validating type of
relationship target gives 404 if target does not exist

That sounds like a bug.

Remember, the 404 message can still contain an xml error. So, does it return
an empty page, or the xml? Using the http return codes might not be in
error.

Should validate returon 2xx when the validation fails? 

Regards


On 12/13/2011 01:51 PM, Stephen Bayliss wrote: 

In the ONTOLOGY datastream of a content model object, one can specify

- the cardinality of a relationship

- the type (ie type from hasModel relationship) of the target

 

I am finding that if the target object does not exist, then the validate
method is reporting a 404 error.  That's the same error as one would get if
one tried to validate an object that didn't exist; so it would instead be
useful to give the XML error to distinguish between these two cases.

 

So, if I have the relationship in test:1's RELS-EXT as follows:

 <info:fedora/test:1> <info:fedora/test:1> <fedora-model:hasModel>
<info:fedora/test:CModel-1> <info:fedora/test:CModel-1>

 <info:fedora/test:1> <info:fedora/test:1> <rel:isMemberOf>
<info:fedora/test:collection> <info:fedora/test:collection>

 

And then in the CModel CModel-1 I define

 

 

    <rdfs:subClassOf>
      <owl:Restriction>
        <owl:onProperty
rdf:resource="info:fedora/fedora-system:def/relations-external#isMemberOf
<http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#exemplarOf%22/> "/>
        <owl:minCardinality
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer%22%3E1%3C/owl:minCardinality>
">1</owl:minCardinality>
      </owl:Restriction>
    </rdfs:subClassOf>

 

    <rdfs:subClassOf>
      <owl:Restriction>
        <owl:onProperty
rdf:resource="info:fedora/fedora-system:def/relations-external#isMemberOf
<http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#exemplarOf%22/> "/>
        <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource=
<info:fedora/test:CModel-collection#class>
"info:fedora/test:CModel-collection#class"/>
      </owl:Restriction>
    </rdfs:subClassOf>

 

Then if the object test:collection does not exist, on validating test:1 I
get a 404 error because it does not exist.

 

Does this sound like a bug?

 

Steve

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many needs.  
But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity 
while improving strategic productivity.  Learn More! 
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to