Hi João Looking at https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo/blob/v3.4.2/fcrepo-security/fcrepo-security -pdp/src/pdp_home/conf/config-attribute-finder.xml the config is there in 3.4.2 to reveal that property using the Fedora RI property URI for it, ie: info:fedora/fedora-system:def/model#ownerId - but you are saying this is not working?
> As far as the JAAS subject attributes, since I couldn't find > more information on this, instead of having JAAS gather all > the user information (as its not required by my application) > I decided to create a new Attribute Finder for subjects that > would query the LDAP server for more user information (some > queries a bit more complex than those allowed by > LDAPAttributeFinder). Compiled it and it worked just fine :) > (yes, this is more a "dev" kind of thing, but thought I > would update you) That's great! Anything you're able to share/contribute back on this I'm sure would be most welcome. Regards Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Zamite [mailto:zam...@xldb.di.fc.ul.pt] > Sent: 04 January 2012 13:43 > To: fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [fcrepo-user] FeSL policies resource OwnerID > > > Hi, > > Thank you for the quick reply. > > I was using Fedora 3.4.2 for these tests which probably > explains why the issue occurred. Were there changes to the > way the attribute finder works for the RDF properties? > > I would switch to 3.5 but that's currently not an option, > maybe in the future as I noticed it has many improvements on FeSL. > > The underscore on my original post was merely a typo. > > As far as the JAAS subject attributes, since I couldn't find > more information on this, instead of having JAAS gather all > the user information (as its not required by my application) > I decided to create a new Attribute Finder for subjects that > would query the LDAP server for more user information (some > queries a bit more complex than those allowed by > LDAPAttributeFinder). Compiled it and it worked just fine :) > (yes, this is more a "dev" kind of thing, but thought I > would update you) > > Meanwhile I realized there were some issues with the bags on > the original LDAPAttributeFinder, in that it tried to encode > some attribute bags instead of using the attribute values. > > Best Regards, > João Zamite > > -- > View this message in context: > http://fedora-commons.1317035.n2.nabble.com/FeSL-policies-reso urce-OwnerID-tp7136520p7150458.html Sent from the Fedora Commons Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
