OK, I installed maven 2 and got different errors. That was it. Now it appears 
it wants to patch fedora and needs jargon. I believe I can handle that.

It looks like the big question will be interfacing/configuring the module to 
use Fedora!

On Tuesday 06 December 2011 10:20:59 Greg Jansen wrote:
> Hi John,
> Here at UNC we use a locally made iRODS low-level storage module. The
> code for this is on github here:
> https://github.com/UNC-Libraries/Carolina-Digital-Repository/tree/master/fc
> repo-irods-storage
> 
> We've also patched the fedora server to allow ingest directly from
> another irods location via an iRODS URI. This LLS module is on our test
> server with 3.5 and it seems to still work. 3.5 Fedora and 3.0 iRODS are
> both in test here and not yet in production, but we have roughly the
> same code running in production against 3.4 and 2.5.
> 
> Also, Mike Conway at DICE has been working on a newer Akubra-compatible
> storage module for iRODS. We are looking to that in the future. This new
> DICE-developed module will take advantage of some of the new Akubra API
> hooks for greater efficiently, such as the BlobStore.moveTo() operation.
> 
> The Spring configuration should make it easier to inject custom config
> into your classes, making it more flexible. In the older Fedora config
> files, you have to pass values through the module class. Now I think you
> should be able to configure whatever beans you need separately.
> 
> Hope this helps. Let me know if you have questions about our
> implementation.
> Greg
> 
> On 12/06/2011 09:32 AM, John H. Hayes II wrote:
> > I am trying to integrate Fedora 3.5 with IRODS 3.0. I read a post of Arah
> > Samadi's where he was asking or help with Fedora and gsearch issues.
> > 
> > There is a fair amount of integration discussing how to integrate IRODS
> > with older versions of Fedora, but Fedora 3.5 has had some modification
> > to the configuration methods. As of 3.5 they are using the spring
> > framework for a lot of this. That has made the Fedora 3.5/IRODS setup
> > more complicated.
> > 
> > Any help at all with information concerning the steps to integrate Fedora
> > 3.5 and IRODS 3.0 would be greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > John Hayes
> > j...@msu.edu
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----- Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
> > This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point
> > of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and
> > packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now!
> > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fedora-commons-users mailing list
> > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to