Yes, just merge it. Thanks :)
On 01/13/2012 09:54 AM, Stephen Bayliss wrote:
Hi Asger
This looks great, thanks - would you like me to go ahead and merge
this into master?
Regards
Steve
-----Original Message-----
*From:* Stephen Bayliss [mailto:stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net]
*Sent:* 19 December 2011 15:40
*To:* 'Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.'
*Subject:* Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models -validating
typeof relationship target gives 404 if targetdoes not exist
Thanks Asger, I'll give this a go.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
*From:* Asger Askov Blekinge [mailto:a...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
*Sent:* 19 December 2011 14:26
*To:* fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models -
validating typeof relationship target gives 404 if target does
not exist
The 1041 branch should now use a separate error message for
the case of allValuesFrom to an non-exisiting object. Unit
tests have verified this. Please try it out.
Regards
On 12/15/2011 10:21 PM, Stephen Bayliss wrote:
Hi Asger
I’ve verified this, the 404 error has gone away.
It would be useful if there was any way to distinguish
between the non-existence of the target object vs the target
object not having the specified type – is this at all possible?
Thanks
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:*Stephen Bayliss
[mailto:stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 13, 2011 7:30 PM
*To:* 'Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.'
*Subject:* Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models -
validating typeof relationship target gives 404 if target
does not exist
Hi Asger - thanks for this. Probably I won't get chance
until early next week to test it, but I do want to test it in
any case.
Regards
Steve
-----Original Message-----
*From:* Asger Askov Blekinge
[mailto:a...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
*Sent:* 13 December 2011 15:52
*To:* fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models -
validating type of relationship target gives 404 if
target does not exist
This branch should fix the problem
https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo/tree/fcrepo-1041
Steve, can you test it easily? Otherwise, I will do it.
Regards
On 12/13/2011 04:11 PM, Stephen Bayliss wrote:
https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1041 raised for this.
-----Original Message-----
*From:* Stephen Bayliss
[mailto:stephen.bayl...@acuityunlimited.net]
*Sent:* 13 December 2011 14:58
*To:* 'Support and info exchange list for Fedora users.'
*Subject:* Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content models
- validating typeof relationship target gives 404 if
target does not exist
Thanks Asger - it returns plain text of the missing
object (but this was from a browser, haven't tried
requesting content type of text/xml). I'll raise a
JIRA for this.
Cheers
Steve
-----Original Message-----
*From:* Asger Askov Blekinge
[mailto:a...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
*Sent:* 13 December 2011 14:25
*To:* fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
*Subject:* Re: [fcrepo-user] Enhanced content
models - validating type of relationship target
gives 404 if target does not exist
That sounds like a bug.
Remember, the 404 message can still contain an
xml error. So, does it return an empty page, or
the xml? Using the http return codes might not be
in error.
Should validate returon 2xx when the validation
fails?
Regards
On 12/13/2011 01:51 PM, Stephen Bayliss wrote:
In the ONTOLOGY datastream of a content model
object, one can specify
- the cardinality of a relationship
- the type (ie type from hasModel relationship)
of the target
I am finding that if the target object does not
exist, then the validate method is reporting a
404 error. That's the same error as one would
get if one tried to validate an object that
didn't exist; so it would instead be useful to
give the XML error to distinguish between these
two cases.
So, if I have the relationship in test:1's
RELS-EXT as follows:
<info:fedora/test:1> <fedora-model:hasModel>
<info:fedora/test:CModel-1>
<info:fedora/test:1> <rel:isMemberOf>
<info:fedora/test:collection>
And then in the CModel CModel-1 I define
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty
rdf:resource="info:fedora/fedora-system:def/relations-external#isMemberOf"/
<http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#exemplarOf%22/>>
<owl:minCardinality
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer";>1</owl:minCardinality
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer%22%3E1%3C/owl:minCardinality>>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty
rdf:resource="info:fedora/fedora-system:def/relations-external#isMemberOf"/
<http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#exemplarOf%22/>>
<owl:allValuesFrom
rdf:resource="info:fedora/test:CModel-collection#class"
<info:fedora/test:CModel-collection#class>/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
Then if the object test:collection does not
exist, on validating test:1 I get a 404 error
because it does not exist.
Does this sound like a bug?
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
