I had an issue where I missed a level of parentheses in an ITQL where
clause, e.g:

a or b and c

rather than:

a or (b and c)

in SQL, these would be identical as AND has higher precedence.

In iTQL (and I may be wrong) it looks like the order is indeterminate
- one test case gave expected results, the other didn't.

Is this the case (obviously, use of parentheses avoids the problem)?

Cheers, Richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to