I had an issue where I missed a level of parentheses in an ITQL where clause, e.g:
a or b and c rather than: a or (b and c) in SQL, these would be identical as AND has higher precedence. In iTQL (and I may be wrong) it looks like the order is indeterminate - one test case gave expected results, the other didn't. Is this the case (obviously, use of parentheses avoids the problem)? Cheers, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users