Under Fedora 3.6, with Akubra, managed datastreams go under the
datastreamStore. The default for that is:
$FEDORA_HOME/data/datastreamStore
but can be changed in the akubra-llstore.xml file. The fedora objects,
including inline "X" datastreams, are stored elsewhere according to
the fsObjectStore parameter in that file.
____________________________________________
Adam Wead
Systems and Digital Collections Librarian
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum
216.515.1960 (t)
215.515.1964 (f)
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, James, Eric <eric.ja...@yale.edu> wrote:
> Following up on the question of M and E datastreams - where does the
> M content actually go?
>
>
>
> At Yale, we've been using the DefaultLowlevelStorageModule without
> incident with fedora 3.4 for the past 3-4 years, but in planning for a
> future larger and integrated fedora repository are looking at other options.
>
>
>
> There is this document (not sure if it's up to date):
>
>
>
> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA34/Configuring+Low+Level+Storage
>
>
>
> in which akubra is described to have a non-database dependent hash driven
> file system vs the date/time algorithm of the default module. But I'm not
> sure what that means in terms of real advantages in maintenence and
> performance.
>
>
>
> In that document there is also mention of 3rd party plugins for iRODS,
> SRB, and Sun Honeycomb, which kind of goes a little way to Richard Green's
> suggestion on the list earlier today about a wish for integration of object
> policies. There was also a recent post from Nikhl Tayal currently creating
> a Dell DX6000 plugin and some fedora futures initiatives to connect
> with asynchronous storage solutions. Again I'm not entirely clear of the
> pro's and con's of these are in terms of a large scalable fedora
> implemetation/cluster that can handle TB+ of heterogenous data from small
> metadata files to large video preservations masters.
>
>
>
> So I guess I'm asking if anyone has any suggestions,
> recommendations, or experience working with these various LLStore modules.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eric
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
