Hi Peri What do the warnings say?
What happens if you updateIndex fromPid? Gert On 13/12/2013, at 19.42, Peri Stracchino wrote: > Hi > We've been running fedoragsearch 2.5 for quite a while against solr 1.4. We > want to upgrade it to run against solr 3.6.1. > Now my solr 3.6.1 installation seems to be working ok - I can post and index > the demonstration xml files. I can also see these files if I go to gsearch > browseIndex and give *:* as my start term, so its obviously looking in the > right place for the index. > > But its not working properly against my new solr yet, because when I try to > update index from foxml files, it runs then finishes with no documents > indexed, just warnings > > I'v changed SOLR_HOME to the new solr > I have copied the schema.xml and solrconfig.xml from <SOLR_HOME>/conf into > fedoragsearch/WEB-INF/classes/fgsconfigFinal/<our index name>/conf. the > foxml to solr indexing format xslt transformation document we were using with > the old solr version is still present. > fgsindex.indexBase = http://<our server address>/solr > fgsindex.indexBase =<oursolr_home>/data/index > > It must surely be looking in the right place for the foxml files, because 1) > the fedora installation hasnt changed, and 2) its reporting an appropriate > number of warnings, given the number of objects in the system and that each > one has apparently failed. If I run uopdate index create empty it makes the > usual request to manualy stop solr, clear the index and restart solr, when I > run updateindex from foxml it initially starts without complaint - its only > when it finishes that it emerges that nothing has actually indexed > > Is there some critical gsearch reconfiguration step I'v missed out, or can > anyone suggest any useful way I can diagnose whats going wrong? I suspect > perhaps there is something in the foxml files - or the output produced by the > transformation script - which conflicts with the schema.xml - it this seems > like the most likely scenario then I'll continue testing this line by line, > but I'm concerned I may be looking in the wrong direction > > any pointers would be much appreciated! > > Peri > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-users mailing list > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
