> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484862
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #2 from John (J5) Palmieri <[email protected]>  2009-06-03 
> 11:45:26 EDT ---
> Of course it conflicts with GConf2.  It is GConf2 with a patch.  Pretty much
> binary ABI compatible unless the two have diverged recently.  It shouldn't be
> used beyond OLPC and even there with the fact that they are getting more 
> memory
> and disk space they should just start using the Orbit2 dependency.  It was a
> hack to reduce dependencies while still letting GNOME packages run without
> modification.
> 
> DConf is the next generation DBus GConf and should be parallel installable 
> once
> it is released (and accepted by GNOME).

Why are the relevant Obsoletes missing (commented out)?
These packages are available to package management tools.
The Fedora guidelines disallow implicit conflicts.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Reply via email to