On 06/08/2009 03:15 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:

> Ah, so it is.  Thanks!  So now my only hurdle is the missing popt-devel
> - any ideas?
> 
That one looks like a genuine packaging bug.  We don't use rpm-devel on
the builders so no one saw it.

The header files for popt are in the main popt package in RHEL5/CentOS5
so that's what actually needs to be required in this instance, not
popt-devel.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Reply via email to